Date: 1.13.12
Name:Dana Yeoshoua
Current Events Journal #5
Title: To Preserve History on the Moon, Visitors Are Asked to Tread Lightly
Author: Kenneth Chang
Source: The New York Times
The topic of the article is Preserving Moon History
The main idea of the article is: (implied/stated) The next generation of people visiting the moon might carelessly obliterate the site of one of humanity's greatest accomplishments, these designations were important first steps toward raising awareness of the need to protect off-world artifacts. (stated)
The author’s purpose for writing this article is to inform the readers
why it is important to keep the moon's most precious artifacts and monuments safe, like the steps of Neil Armstrong and Apollo 11 trips and more.
The author’s perspective in this article is objective/subjective (biased) because
The pattern of organization of the article is chronological order
The reason the author chose this pattern for the article is because it talks about how Dr.O'Leary tried to get in touch with NASA so that way she could tell them about what they could do to help prevent history on the moon from getting destroyed. It started in 1999 when one of her students asked her whether federal preservation laws applied to the Apollo landing sites. And it still goes on today to help preserve the moon for any future visitors.
The text features included in the article are The title (which helps to find out what the main idea of the story and what the story could maybe about).
This article is about (a summary in your own words) archaeologists and historians trying to help and make sure people do not damage the moon in the future.
The significance (importance) of this article is that archaeologists and historians are trying to protect the moon from any damage, mostly on historical sites, artifacts, and the places where some of the greatest space missions landed.
What I learned from this article is that when people will start paying to go to the moon they might destroy/damage monumental sites, and so people have must be careful to not hurt anything of nature, especially one of humanity's greatest accomplishments.
What I liked about this article was that the author made sure to include details and understandable information.
What I did not like about it was that he didn't talk much about what they are doing now about it.
Who should read this article and why whoever is planning to go to the moon (like they'd have the money) should read this article so that way they know that they shouldn't damage any part of the moon.
This article reminds me of
(text-to-self) This reminds me of the time when i went to a museum (science).
(text-to-text) This reminds me of the my science fold able
(text-to-world) People want to fly to the moon now.
New vocabulary I learned
Word Context Clues Meaning
1.-
2.-
3.-